## A Nobel Prize Brings Black Holes to Light

- by iqu
- in Uncategorized
- on November 18, 2020

# A Nobel Prize is just the latest proof that a concept rejected by Einstein in 1939 has become one of the hottest topics in physics

- By Avi Loeb on

With black holes, what you see is not what you get. The ring of light visible around a black hole’s silhouette originates from a radius of about 5GM/c^{2}, where G is Newton’s constant, M is the black hole mass and c is the speed of light. This ring is larger than the event horizon of a nonspinning black hole by a factor of 2.5—or up to five with the addition of spin. And so, truth in advertising requires me to tell you the Event Horizon Telescope did not actually image the event horizon of the supermassive black hole in the galaxy M87, but rather the light from much farther out.

For a distant observer, the difference between the light ring and the horizon is academic, but for an astronaut en route into the black hole, the difference is existential. Entering the ultimate prison walls associated with the horizon implies a death sentence, with no opportunity for sharing the experience with the outside world. After less than a day, the astronaut’s body will reach the singularity and be torn apart by gravitational tidal force.

In 1939, Albert Einstein wrote a paper in *Annals of Mathematics* doubting that black holes exist in nature. Now, black holes are in vogue—so much so that the 2020 Nobel prize in physics was awarded to three scientists who have studied them. This gave me reason to celebrate, as the founding director of Harvard’s Black Hole Initiative, which brings together astronomers, physicists, mathematicians and philosophers, all dedicated to research on black holes.

Karl Schwarzschild would have been delighted to join our celebration. Unfortunately, he died on the German-Russian front during World War I over a century ago, just half a year after deriving the nonspinning black hole solution to Einstein’s equations.

One of the recipients of the 2020 Nobel, Roger Penrose, demonstrated that black holes are a robust prediction of Einstein’s general theory of relativity, and in doing so invented a new mathematical tool to depict spacetimes, called Penrose diagrams. He also showed that it is possible to extract energy from a spinning black hole as if it were a flywheel, through the so-called Penrose process. His cosmic censorship hypothesis protects our ability to make predictions about the future of universe from the pathology of black hole singularities, where the spacetime curvature blows up and Einstein’s theory breaks down. This conjecture asserts that all singularities are hidden behind an event horizon so that matter approaching them has no causal effect on what happens outside the horizon. Just as they say about Las Vegas, “whatever happens inside the horizon, stays inside the horizon.”

The two other Nobel laureates in physics this year, Reinhard Genzel and Andrea Ghez, demonstrated that a black hole weighing four million suns resides at the center of our own Milky Way galaxy. The discovery of quasars more than half a century ago implied that supermassive black holes form generically at the centers of galaxies. By monitoring the motion of massive stars around the center of our own galaxy in real time, as if they were planets orbiting a star, they demonstrated the existence of a black hole there. Prior to their work, it was unclear whether a black hole is associated with the stationary radio source Sagittarius A*.

Not only did they measure the mass of the black hole, but they also tested Einstein’s theory of gravity. The stars they discovered move in two orbital planes. In a new paper with Giacomo Fragione, we showed that the black hole spin must therefore be small, or else it would blur the strict orbital planes of the stars over their lifetime. The teams led by Genzel and Ghez were engaged in intense competition, elevating their efforts to great heights. This was a wonderful demonstration of how rivalry promotes good science.

One of the stars traced by Genzel and Ghez, labeled S2, completes an orbit around the galactic center every 16 years. The related advice I gave astronomy students is to focus their Ph.D. project on a source like S2 that evolves over a timescale of a decade or two, so that they will continue to learn new things about the source throughout their careers.

If Stephen Hawking was alive, he would have been a worthy contender for this year’s Nobel prize, since his work paralleled that of Penrose on classical general relativity, with the addition of the quantum mechanical aspect of black hole evaporation.

Black holes are simple and complex at the same time. They are described by mass, charge and spin, yet as Jacob Bekenstein first recognized, they carry a huge entropy. It would be remarkable to have a field trip to the nearest black hole and study it up close. The journey would be practical over a human lifetime if there is one in the solar system.

Even though black holes are the darkest objects when left on their own, they appear as the brightest sources of light when dressed up with a shroud of matter, making them perfect symbols of Halloween. Outflows from supermassive black holes shape the evolution of entire galaxies. These beasts stop growing only because they become so energetic that they shove their food off their dining table.